Link reblogged from Michaelangerlo with 61 notes
“I’m fascinated by the idea that someone who identifies as a libertarian might be in favor of limiting someone’s liberty. …”—
Ari Kohen - A Challenge for Libertarians Against Federal Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage
Being against the government’s involvement in marriage…
RON PAUL IS NOT FOR GAY MARRIAGE. he is for states rights. Obama believes it should be between and man and woman but ALSO believes it should be left up to states rights
So you are insinuating that Ron Paul doesn’t think it should be “between a man and a woman”?
That’s funny because Ron Paul specifically said in a recent debate when talking about gay marriage: “I am supportive of all voluntary associations and people can call it whatever they want.”
Also, he’s not for “state’s rights”. States don’t have rights, people do. He says that per the constitution it’s at most a state issue.
Thats funny because he specifically said voluntary associations and “government involvement”..he doesn’t support gays, he supports the choice. with that choice will come many other deregulated “associations”.
also, all his people’s rights is fancy talk for states rights. come on people.
Source: kohenari
L.A. Liberty: Re:...Libertarian Doubles Down
Your condescension aside, I think that on substance we are probably close in agreement. My objection was to your...
Oops. I guess I overestimated your capacity for intelligent thought!
So you are insinuating that Ron Paul doesn’t think it should be “between a man and a woman”?
Over at his L.A. Liberty blog, a libertarian responds to my quotation...Steve Horwitz’s...
To be fair, Ron Paul publicly rejected...previous support
jeffmiller writes:...Jeff is right that Obama’s stated positions on same-sex...
Liberals are should be challenging Paul, not Libertarians- just as you say Liberals should challenge Obama. perhaps its...
This was featured in #Politics